Showing posts with label by Pratik Raghu (June 09). Show all posts
Showing posts with label by Pratik Raghu (June 09). Show all posts

DOWN COME THE PEACOCKS





On the 11th of June, the air was veritably buzzing with quantitative questions: exactly how many rings would Franck Ribery run around right backs? How long would it take for Wayne Rooney to slip on his shooting boots and unleash the lethality within? When would the “red hot” Antonio Di Natale rip the back of a net with a Jabulani ball? Come match day nine, a wholly unforeseen inquiry is looming large over the Rainbow Nation: will another one bite the dust? The good citizens of England, France and Italy must surely be cursing national bookmakers for their naivety. Why has their billing as favorites become little more than a bad joke?










England: Same old tosh, different tourney




Rather than being an eternal spring of motivation, England’s 1966 triumph has made countless generations of pudgy pub – goers delude themselves into believing the Three Lions are infinitely capable of repeating the feat. One cannot help but admire their unshakable dedication to the Union Jack, even after decades of taking dejected flights home. It is then tragic that, once again, they have to bear with utterly half hearted floundering, courtesy of the “heroes” they refuse to remove from pedestals. Neither the absence of Rio Ferdinand nor Robert Green’s hideous error should be associated with the two measly points England are clinging to. For, you see, to do so would be to turn a blind eye to the embarrassing fact that the current crop of English poster – boys simply cannot make the grade. Why appoint one of the world’s most successful managers if none of his coaching staff acknowledge that Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard cannot be lumped together in midfield? What is the point of winning all your qualification matches if you cannot muster one miserable goal against ‘mighty’ Algeria? If these statements were leaked to the hoards decked out in white and red, I’d probably have to go underground, hire personal bodyguards and change my name. However, before fleeing to some nondescript South American hideout, I’d ask the jersey – toting lot thirsting for my blood to ponder the following: when was the last time an English player was awarded the Ballon D’or? How many of the English Premier League’s stars – past and present – hailed from foreign lands? And how many times have England reached the World Cup semi – finals in the last 44 years? Reality bites, doesn’t it, old boys?





France: Les Bleus ont les bleus






This article was not written in a single sitting. In the duration between the scripting of the paragraph above and the typing of these words, the eggs that had been cooking on English faces were somewhat scraped off by a meager win over Slovenia that secured passage into the Round of 16. I may consider retracting some of my anti – Anglo admonitions, but by no means can I avoid lynching 2006’s losing finalists (yes, really). This decade has been a patchy one to say the least for French football – glory at Euro 2000 and Zidane’s German swansong were punctuated by humiliation in Portugal and then Austria. However, the French’s almost ludicrous failure in South Africa is best likened to their farcical 2002 World Cup campaign: they may have managed to get on the score sheet, but that actually only emphasizes the pathetic standards upheld by Raymond Domenech’s schoolboys. To say that they had a certain “je ne sais quoi” about them is to highlight their startling lack of quality in the cruelest possible way. Would the inclusion of Karim Benzema and Samir Nasri have injected some much needed freshness into a weathered squad way past its prime? Should Nicolas Anelka and his posse have disputed less and trained more? Will Nicolas Sarkozy declare Monsieur Domenech an enemy of the state? Perhaps we should look to karma for answers: maybe France was doomed the minute Thierry Henry gave the Irish a hand (pardon the pun). 


Qui connait? Quelquefois, les choses juste vont mal.


Italy: Can’t – enaccio
Let me be clear: I was not even passively impressed when Fabio Cannavaro lifted football’s most coveted prize four years ago, simply as his men had not stayed true to the spirit of the beautiful game. Say what you want about the effectiveness of astute tactics, but I refuse to accept that cynical, calculative defending should be the cornerstone of any aspiring team in the international arena. Football is Diego Maradona’s unforgettable dart past hapless Englishmen in 1986; it is not pointless plodding around the center circle in order to wind down the clock. The Italians may yet emerge triumphant from tonight’s clash with Slovakia, but their feeble frontline and unimaginative midfield have hardly gone unnoticed; with usually fanatical fans now snorting at the Azzuri’s lack of a spark, the likelihood of hollow success cannot be ignored. The time has come for the trophy of trophies to be pried from overly cautious, Milanese glove – covered fingers. Euro 2008 left spectators with fond memories because of – and not despite – Italy’s premature exit in the first round. Let us hope then that Robert Vittek comes to Ellis Park to strut his stuff: for Italy’s loss will certainly prove football’s gain.
Let me just say that the criticisms above are not reflective of overall disappointment with the World Cup; the competition is starting to come to the boil, and the goal – scarcity that dogged its early stages has all but dissipated. I am not opposed to any football nation, and falls from grace do not fill me with glee. In recent years, the sport I and so many others love has been mired in scandal and monetary transactions. What I want, what I feel all fans deserve, is a tribute to football game itself, matches played with joie de vivre and without fear.  If established reputations have to be sacrificed and egos deflated to achieve this end, then I hope, from the bottom of my heart, that the altars have been readied and the needles sharpened.


Continue Reading...

PASSION

An inferno ignites your bones. The tips of your toes tingle with electricity. Your vision sharpens, your breathing intensifies, your mind focuses like a magnifying glass. Passion has just seized you by the wrist, invaded your consciousness and infused your every cell. Passion has numerous symbols and countless descriptors. It has been analyzed by philosophers, explored by historians and utilized by visionaries and leaders, artists and philanthropists. It gushed through Mahatma Gandhi’s veins as he walked India’s dusty paths. It coated Michelangelo’s hands as David rose out of marble and into being. If anything is certain, if anything holds true, it is that passion has a power beyond comprehension and an uncanny tendency to shape the universe.

Passion is the star that helps drifting souls navigate the world’s turbulent tides. Nothing is as singularly capable of transforming a monotonous existence into a life of sincere purpose and sublime joy. Why? I think it is because passion is blind to boundaries. It cares not for socio-economic status, disregards disabilities and invalidates the ‘need’ for natural ability. It knows no limits, and it obliterates all obstacles.

Tragically, in this hectic age, we all too often get sucked into completing menial tasks, working with oppressive deadlines and juggling cumbersome responsibilities. The flames that previously crackled in our chest cavities are reduced to glowing embers. We begin to see little difference between one day and the next. We become resigned creatures of habit, not ardent pursuers of visions. That is why it is so important for us to put aside circumstances and speak to our hearts: they will not mislead us by encouraging negativity, for the heart of every person is aware that he who serves the most, reaps the most. John Lennon imagined a ‘perfect’ world without countries or religion. Now, picture a global community of individuals driven by selfless passion, in pursuit of their dreams, leading lives that are bless in turn. Which seems more ideal and less idealistic? Which world would you want to inhabit?


by Pratik Raghu.
Continue Reading...

Personal Favourites April 2009 - April 2010

Personal Favourites April 2009 – April 2010

Excerpt 1:
A more savage way you can help to kill this killer of ancestors is by dumping chemicals anywhere you like! Just dump those chemicals. Make sure it is toxic! The rivers usually are the favourite. If you dump the river, you will kill the fish living in there, or probably mutate it. The chemicals would also react with the water itself, forming whatever other horror substances that you can imagine, making the water too toxic to be used. Serves the aquatic life for killing our ancestors! The seas maybe a bt hard though, but if everyone works together, it’ll work.
Up next, nuclear bombs. Oh yeah! These are probably some of the best ways to kill the Earth. Let’s bomb anywhere we like with these hardcore mass killers. They can make a real big crater in the Earth along with making the surrounding air radioactive. You can make tsunamis out of them too. Bomb anywhere you like. The forests, the polar ice caps, the deep blue seas, big cities, up to you! Kill everything living on this Earth! That should show Earth what she’s dealing with!

The Editor-in-Chief says: This is an excerpt from “Let’s Kill the Earth!” (July 09) by Ariffin B Mohd Amir. Ariffin is known among us for his unusual opinions and the unusual way he expresses them. This satirical piece is a good representation of his style. In it he tells the reader to do everything he can to destroy the earth. But this, of course, is not his objective. When the reader gets to the end, he realises that all the things the writer is telling him to do have already been done. This makes the issue at hand rather poignant. Ariffin was a regular OM contributor. In fact, this issue comes with what is perhaps his last contribution (he is graduating soon).


Excerpt 2:
An Arrested Heart.
Nadzirah Yunos

You speak of rhymes
Dance with words,
Mimic poets,
With fingers in my curls.

Paint my heart red,
With a brush of your lips,
A voice that wraps me,
Of rhapsodic rapture.

When eyes turn black,
All is never lost,
Take me with insight,
Blithely within,
Fiery inside.

The Editor-in-Chief says: This is an absolute favourite of mine as it appeared in our pilot issue. The writer, better known to us as GG, was a student of IB3. She had taken English A1 for close to a year and half, and eventually decided to switch to English B. I love this short poem for its very precise and effective choice of diction. “Rhapsodic rapture” is a nice touch, allowing me to “hear” the voice of the lover. I hope GG is still writing poetry!

Excerpt 3:
Today’s world is characterized by speed; we are a people that are truly on the move. From the angered banging of the table when a program fails to load instantaneously, to the hurried cadence of the march which characterizes today’s executive; we are ceaseless in our efforts to speed things up. Today’s world is not satisfied with anything but instant gratification, and the entire service industry has adapted to fit our desire. One has only to look as far as fast food, one of the most defining concepts of our generation to see our desire projected onto food as well. We have let speed become one of the most treasured qualities of today’s marketplace, where speed and its sister ease of use rule an oligarchy of thought.
This epidemic of thought is most visible in the desperately treasured youth of today. Having grown up at the very cusp of the technological revolution, knowing nothing of the before and seeing only before it the boundless open spaces offered by this delightful new medium, this generation has not stopped in its ceaseless journey forward. Technology and its mediums are the train pushing forward, building its rails as it goes, and sitting atop in true pioneer fashion: with the wind in their faces and the excitement ever-present, is this generation. Information technology has managed to accomplish something unique to technology of the past, in that it can self-replicate fast enough to update itself. The train never fears a lack of fuel, for with every day there comes a new sacrifice to the furnace.

The Editor-in-Chief says: An excerpt from “Loneliness: A Utopian Nightmare” (Nov 09) by Lewis Jackson, one of our in-house authors. Lewis is known for having colourful opinions and his expressiveness, all of which are evident in this article about the “dark side” of modern technology. I agree with everything said here: the modern world is all about speed and superficiality. There is very little space for sincerity and retrospection. What a pity that the very tools that are supposed to help us develop are robbing us of our humanity (look around you when you are in a mall and see how many people are completely mesmerised by their I-phones). Incidentally, Lewis also writes interesting poetry.

Excerpt 4:
Our wretched self-absorption and brutal capabilities are surmounted only by our ability to turn a blind eye. Ignorance is anything but bliss for those who bawl for assistance to no avail. How convenient it is to imagine that we are any closer to achieving the oh-so-ambitious Millennium Development Goals. That our glittering sneakers weren’t as a matter of fact made by a little boy in the stuffy confines of a Chinese workshop, desperate to earn a bowl of rice and not a cold-blooded thrashing. That so much of the natural beauty we readily take for granted will shortly cease to exist as a direct result of our consumerism, our hunger for looming glass facades and brimming gas tanks. Convenience is the fog that clouds our compassionate perception, while passivity is the rocket that incinerates a Gazan youngster, the chain link fence that locks in a Sri Lankan refugee. Perhaps the advent of high technology has helped us sink even deeper into the comatose recesses of our comfort zones, where no shock waves can churn the waters of our consciences. Perhaps we consistently, tragically err when choosing between what is right and what is easy.
But what if, what if the night is darkest just before the dawn? I do believe that the forces of light are capable of penetrating even the most consuming darkness. In every age, a handful of individuals have always managed to break free of the suffocating bonds of ignorance, selfishness and violence to inspire and uplift the rest of us. Think Oprah Winfrey, Bono and Mohamed Yunus, Mahatma Gandhi, Desmond Tutu and Oskar Schindler: to follow in their illustrious footsteps, to move towards realizing the Utopian vision, we need to look inwards and confront that which truly frightens us. We have to awaken our consciences and open our hearts. We must embrace the fact that we are not enemies, but friends, that while passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. We need, now more than ever, to become the change that we want to see in the world.

The Editor-in-Chief says: The title of this piece is “The Illusion – At Present” (Feb 10), written by Pratik Raghu – our very own humanitarian. Pratik is someone with a voice of his own, and he often expresses himself beautifully. This piece demonstrates his exceptional command of the language and also his thoughts on weighty humanitarian issues. Extreme individualism (which I feel is a product of materialism) is an epidemic that is threatening the well-being of the human race. In our age, it seems impossible to imagine another Gandhi or Oskar Schindler.

Excerpt 5:
A couple of years ago, while walking the streets of West End trying to decide which play to see, I saw a poster in Piccadilly theatre for Guys and Dolls featuring none other than Patrick Swayze! The decision made, I marched straight in to get a ticket. That night, I walked into the auditorium with butterflies in my stomach. I was finally going to see Sam/Johnny! As the curtain came up, an announcement was made over the PA stating that an understudy would be playing Patrick Swayze’s role of Nathan Detroit as Mr. Swayze was ill. I was crushed that my crush would not be appearing that night. I stillmanaged to enjoy the show though.
Patrick Swayze has cemented his place in my heart and mind. To me, he portrays characters who display the best qualities of a man. His ability to portray them so convincingly on screen must mean that it comes naturally from within. That makes him a beautiful man inside and out. Ever since Ghost, Patrick Swayze has held a piece of my heart. With his passing, he takes that piece with him.

The Editor-in-Chief says: “(I’ve Had) The Time of My Life” (Oct 09) by Ms Geraldine Phillips reminded me of my own teenage years in the 1980s, when Patrick Swayze charmed the socks off everyone by playing a sympathetic ghost. Swayze succumbed to cancer at the age of 57. Along with the death of Michael Jackson, Swayze’s passing was another wake-up call for me: Everything changes. Going from day to day, you may operate under the illusion that you are immortal; but the brutal truth is no-one and nothing is to remain for ever.

Excerpt 6:
Apart from freedom, not having a good relationship with parents keeps teenagers from being happy. I know I’m not happy when I’m not on good terms with mum or dad. I would either be really pissed off, annoyed or you’ll see me ranting to my friends about it. I get annoyed by them really easily as they would always have something bad to say about everything especially when it comes to my education. I can say that I do not have a good relationship with my parents. Yes, I admit it. It’s true. And because of that, I hate talking to my parents about anything important especially when it comes to education. I can tell you that if I do go talk to them about it, I would end up crying even before I can say anything. I just feel that it is a sensitive issue to me to be talking to them about it. I think it is because of how they respond to it and what they say to me about it. I tried talking to them about education a lot of times before this; when changing my course from SAM in Taylor’s College to IB in Sri KDU. It was hell for me to go through all the conversations. I remember crying about it when talking to them about it or at least I felt like crying. I would hold back my tears most of the time when I’m strong enough. I usually breakdown after talking to them anyway.

The Editor-in-Chief says: The Nov o9 discussion topic “Teen Angst” caused some writers to pour their hearts out. Our ever-dependable advertiser/publicist/Facebook-manager Yati Ishak handed in a piece which is both personal and revealing. It reveals to us why teenagers are often unhappy during what is in fact the best time of their lives. Pressure from parents to perform well academically, pressure from friends, pressure from society – all these different forms of pressure make it sound as if adolescence were some kind of pressure-cooker. She writes, “I hate talking to my parents about anything important…” This is something I can relate to. Even to this day, at the tender age of 37, I still don’t tell my parents half the things I do.
Continue Reading...

A Plea for Equilibrium - Pratik Raghu

A Plea for Equilibrium
Pratik Raghu



This week, the inevitable came to pass: we, the unassuming citizens of the IB June 2009 Intake, were comprehensively walloped by the full force of the Diploma Programme, as Internal Assessments ambushed us with relentless ferocity. All of a sudden, relaxation seemed to become but a subject for whatever little wishful thinking we managed to squeeze into our hectic schedules. CAS activities were unceremoniously shoved to the corners of our minds, giving way to unforgiving assessment criteria, half-formed ideas for outlandish experiments and grudgingly accepted ‘notes – to self.’ A collective exhaustion seemed to overcome us as we scurried to achieve our ends with deadlines looming over us like ominous, unmoving clouds. Our voices began to decry the workload that our pre – university course is infamous for, and the semicircular skin patches beneath our eyes took on the smoky, ragged tone indicative of sleep deprivation and mental overwork.



As you can see, I have no shortage of melancholic descriptors to associate with what has proved a rather testing period, in which we have understood what we got ourselves into ten long months ago. But, to continue to do so would oppose the very purpose with which I set out to script this article. What is this intention? Why did I opt to avoid considering the enigma of morality, and instead focus on occurrences that are all too apparent to us?



I distinctly remember the several months that preceded the one in which I sat for my IGCSEs. I confess – with a degree of pained regret that has yet to ebb away – that I allowed myself to be sucked into the black hole that is frenzied exam preparation. I saw nothing on my horizon but the neatly printed booklets I knew I would rush through in a yawning, air-conditioned hall with a dimpled gray floor. It suffices to say that I worked myself into a rut. So hysterically did I pour over dog – eared textbooks late into the night, so manically did I become obsessed with leaving no academic pebble unturned, my body and mind began to give up on me. The ephemeral joy I felt at a few months thereafter for having got decent grades was not worth the ordeal I subjected myself to, spurning my friends and compromising my own well-being.



I recently read The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari, a “fable about achieving your dreams and fulfilling your destiny” by leadership guru Robin Sharma. It effectively affirmed a suspicion I had begun to have after becoming an IB student: a life of balance, of inner harmony and outward compassion, of multifaceted joys and zealous verve, is the only existence worth maintaining. I felt impassioned to restart sketching on a regular basis, thus giving the creative side of my mind an outlet for self expression. I began to dedicate parts of every day to relishing a mind-expanding book with a mug of light tea by my side. Be assured: I am not Siddhartha, and I have not even come close to achieving enlightenment. I remain a flawed individual, capable of making highly regrettable errors and conceiving thoughts that are of no benefit to anyone. However, I can say that I have undergone a change of sorts that has benefited me: I have felt more at ease recently, more collected and, most importantly, happier.



I hope I haven’t ‘blown my own trumpet’ in stating what I have: if so, please forgive me, for I admit that I have yet to become truly humble. What I want to ultimately say is this: we cannot let the tasks on our chock – full agenda bog us down and dominate our lives, as doing so is entirely detrimental. We should never lose sight of who we are, and become hapless, broken workaholics, driven solely by the desire to get a diploma at all costs. We must set aside time for ourselves, for enjoying a furious game of football under the evening sun, or having a meaningful conversation over dinner. I sincerely feel that we’ll be far more productive if we spit in the face of stress, and actively choose to take all challenges in our stride. I believe we owe it to ourselves to lead rich, fruitful lives, characterized by contentment and calm. Let us, then, embrace the IB Diploma Programme for what it actually is: not a condemnation to two years of ceaseless, draining industry, but an excellent opportunity to explore ourselves, learn the art of shrewd time management and prepare to enter society, ready to contribute positively.




Continue Reading...

LOVE: QUEST’CE QUE C’EST? (Pratik Raghu, June 09)




LOVE: QUEST’CE QUE C’EST?
 Pratik Raghu

A lean, blue eyed youth is illuminated by the moon, his pearly whites glittering like nighttime lights reflected by a river. His Adam’s apple bobs expectantly as he gently grasps the slender wrist of his ‘Cherie’, a near – ethereal vision of flawless skin and downy, auburn hair. They come together, their statuesque silhouettes framed crisply against a vast sky flecked with winking stars. As their lips lock, their arms entwine and their fingers dig into each other’s backs, an angst fuelled rock song from the early part of the last decade reaches its heart – rending climax.

Let us collectively thank the US of A for crafting the stereotypical image of love detailed above. Be it through movies, music or fashion statements, those Yanks sure know how to strike chords, don’t they? In the same way that they’ve reeled us into remarking “Oh my god!” for no apparent reason, in the same way that they’ve made half the civilized world suit up in low cut jeans, they’ve managed to radically alter the way the most powerful force in the universe is perceived. Label me a backward – thinking prude if you so wish, but I refuse to believe that true love must involve slavishly holding hands, swaying dazedly under a spotlight at a prom or spending hours on the phone saying “nothing at all” (sorry, Gym Class Heroes). What I would like to do is wash off the distorting makeup applied by Western pop – culture icons to try and fathom what love is, what it connotes, what it requires and what it can offer.

As far as the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary is concerned, love is “a strong feeling of deep affection for someone or something.” Accepting this vague, sterile definition of something so profoundly influential would be tantamount to saying that Charles Dickens was ‘a half - decent writer’ or describing the microprocessor as ‘a rather significant development.’ We can only comprehend the ramifications of love if we look around the tiny green planet we inhabit. Love is the force that drives a lioness to perennially keep an eye on her carefree cubs, as they gambol, trip, fall and gambol some more.  Love is the adhesive that can bind hearts together even as hairlines recede, exteriors crinkle and spines succumb to gravity. Love is the fire that crackled in Mahatma Gandhi’s chest cavity as he battled for India’s independence and, ultimately, its soul. Love has inspired acts of indescribable benevolence and nobility that continue to be reference points for us today.  It has obliterated seemingly insurmountable obstacles posed by ethnicity, religion, nationality, language and economic status. It has fuelled the conception and creation of our finest works of art and our most uplifting pieces of music. How can we then not conclude that love has shaped the world as we know it? Such is its power, such is its universality, such is its capability to change.

I feel that love mandates understanding and whole-hearted acceptance. How can we claim to love someone when we are unaware of that person’s true nature? Love requires that we recognize failings and idiosyncrasies without being disgusted, outraged or turned away: one shouldn’t forget that, as far as human beings as concerned, perfection is illusory. People should be forgiven for possessing aggravating mannerisms and for making decisions that we would not have. “Hate the sin, love the sinner,” as a “half -naked Indian fakir” once proclaimed. Judgment should always be preceded by careful consideration and insightful observation. We have to admire ‘the complete picture,’ not just the deft brush strokes in one particular corner.

Love requires compromise. Once we have accepted an individual’s flaws, it seems only sensible to display our love through compassionate accommodation.  This may involve giving up precious time, altering one’s lifestyle or even stepping into the ‘line of fire’ to shield and protect. I certainly believe that divorce rates in Western societies will plummet dramatically if Europeans and Americans become truly conscious of the importance of selflessness to a marriage.  It goes without saying that this applies as much to husbands as it does to wives: just as you cannot expect a single hand to clap by itself, you cannot say that a marriage involving chauvinistic subservience and overt concessions has true love as its cornerstone. Very many conservative Indians should commit the above sentence to memory! I personally feel indignant outrage every time I see sari – clad wives solemnly waiting for their husbands to polish their plates so that they can take their places at the table. Devotion should be cherished, not taken advantage of, and commitments should be whole-hearted expressions of one’s willingness to support, not obligations that must be attended to.

Needless to say, honesty is vital to the long term maintenance of relationships. Suspicions should never be given even an inkling of a chance to take root, while openness should be perpetuated from the get – go. I’m reminded of an excellently crafted short story by Jhumpa Lahiri, in which a husband and wife revive their flailing marriage by admitting their deepest secrets to each other in a blackout. The skeletons of one’s past need public funerals, for, if they’re tightly locked away in closets, they become quite adept at the art of sudden ambushing.

I find myself sighing exasperatedly as this article nears its conclusion. The fact of the matter is, love has touched human hearts for thousands of years. It is relevant to everything from literature, art, music and moviemaking to sociology, statistics, politics and the natural world. Its omnipresence seems to rival that of pagan religious icons – and yet, even humanity’s most scholarly minds struggle to assign it a definitive definition. I suppose that we’re then forced to place love in the same category as God, the meaning of life and the origins of the universe. Maybe some things must be intuited, and not known. I don’t know if we’re meant to get to the bottom of love – but I do fiercely believe that we’re meant to embrace, rejoice and spread it from the depths of our hearts.
Continue Reading...

THE ILLUSION - AT PRESENT (Pratik Raghu, June 09)

How ironic can it be that we explore the notion of Utopia as the all-too appropriately labelled ‘decade from hell’ comes to an uncertain, screeching halt? If the last ten years have proved anything, it is that we as a race have many hurdles to clear before a ‘perfect world’ becomes more than just the subject of melodies by philanthropic musicians. The optimists among you may crinkle your noses at my less than upbeat summation of the era that so recently faded into the annals of things past. You may triumphantly point out numerous technological breakthroughs that punctuated the ‘noughties,’ or bring to my kind attention the election of an African-American president. Allow me to ask you this: what do the September 11th terrorist attacks, the Bali nightclub bombings, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, the Indian Ocean tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, the global recession, the global food security crisis, unrelenting climate change, waves of violence in Pakistan, North Korea’s nuclear testing, Israel’s invasion and blockade of Gaza, SARS, bird flu and swine flu have in common?

It is my belief that we should avoid pointing to specific causes of turmoil that have offset the possibility of a bright new feature, in which all the people of the world hold hands, singing in sugar-coated falsetto voices while dancing beneath a rainbow. This is not because I consider Al-Qaeda’s atrocities acceptable, subsequent ‘Islam-phobia’ tolerable or China’s ridiculously irresponsible growth justified. I feel that the problems we really need to address lie within, embedded deep in the enigma that is human nature.

Human beings are inherently selfish: most of us are far more concerned with ensuring our continued wellbeing than with extending our hands to those who desperately need to lift themselves off the proverbial ground. If you protest that this is not the case, explain then why half of this planet’s population is allowed to survive on less than a dollar a day: if sharing is caring, what does the aforementioned statistic say about us? Why does a minute portion of mankind possess the vast majority of attainable wealth? If the needle of the global environmental status meter has indeed moved into the red zone, why aren’t major manufacturers banding together to ‘go green’ for the greater good? Maybe the conspicuous absence of global conflict has helped us forget that suffering is still very much a destructive force to be reckoned with. Irrespective of reasoning, there can be little doubt that we have become sucked into the trivialities of our own ‘hectic’ lives, content with pushing the flipsides of our privileged existences to the basements of our awareness.

History unequivocally proves that a savage beast lies dormant within all of us, waiting on tiptoes for a chance to unleash its unbridled, malicious fury on anything and anyone, everything and everyone. The denizens of the animal kingdom kill out of sheer necessity: human beings, on the other hand, need but half a creaking, feeble excuse to execute acts of almost surreal cruelty. The lack of instigation that we require to set us off down a bowel-covered warpath is truly the stuff that nightmares are made from. Think about this: it took but a handful of subliminal message-laced broadcasts from a single radio station to turn Rwanda’s streets into corpse-populated avenues of decapitation and decay. We seem to possess an overwhelming desire to reduce ourselves to smithereens. The tools we have diligently crafted to aid us in our communally suicidal quest are too numerous to list. Could Hitler’s consummately disturbing pledge indeed be an acute observation of our potential for incomprehensible destruction?

“We shall drag a world down with us – a world in flames.” 
~ Adolf Hitler (1889-1945)

Our wretched self-absorption and brutal capabilities are surmounted only by our ability to turn a blind eye. Ignorance is anything but bliss for those who bawl for assistance to no avail. How convenient it is to imagine that we are any closer to achieving the oh-so-ambitious Millennium Development Goals. That our glittering sneakers weren’t as a matter of fact made by a little boy in the stuffy confines of a Chinese workshop, desperate to earn a bowl of rice and not a cold-blooded thrashing. That so much of the natural beauty we readily take for granted will shortly cease to exist as a direct result of our consumerism, our hunger for looming glass facades and brimming gas tanks. Convenience is the fog that clouds our compassionate perception, while passivity is the rocket that incinerates a youngster in Gaza, the chain link fence that locks in a Sri Lankan refugee. Perhaps the advent of high technology has helped us sink even deeper into the comatose recesses of our comfort zones, where no shock waves can churn the waters of our consciences. Perhaps we consistently, tragically err when choosing between what is right and what is easy.

But what if, what if the night is darkest just before the dawn? I do believe that the forces of light are capable of penetrating even the most consuming darkness. In every age, a handful of individuals have always managed to break free of the suffocating bonds of ignorance, selfishness and violence to inspire and uplift the rest of us. Think Oprah Winfrey, Bono and Muhammad Yunus, Mahatma Gandhi, Desmond Tutu and Oskar Schindler: to follow in their illustrious footsteps, to move towards realizing the Utopian vision, we need to look inwards and confront that which truly frightens us. We have to awaken our consciences and open our hearts. We must embrace the fact that we are not enemies, but friends, that while passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. We need, now more than ever, to become the change that we want to see in the world.
Continue Reading...

Peom: KILLING ALZHEIMER

by Pratik Raghu (June 09)
Two black flames had been masked by cloud,
A knife’s edge had been smothered by a shroud,
Two titanium claws had been gnawed by age,
An indomitable eagle had been trapped in a cage,
A razor of a beak had been all but clipped,
Towards unbroken silence the scales seemed tipped,
The forest floor slid slowly out of frame,
But the battered raptor would not succumb in shame,
The shadows of its feathers were again on the ground,
It soared to another tree, and there it found,
Chicks that nudged the side of its head,
Chirps that drowned out bitterness and dread,
Then and again it plummeted from the nest,
Still, still, it refused compliance and rest,
Now, it squints at the demon that hangs,
And rolls back the years to shatter its fangs,
For, you see, the blaze that appeared doused and gone,
Now roasts misery from dusk to dawn.
Continue Reading...

THE KLIMUN EXPERIENCE

Some words and phrases just resonate with absolute power and meaning. The description of a person or an event as “life changing” can be cited as an example of this axiom. To think that a personality, a speech, an action, a revelation or an idea is so significant as to alter the purpose of your existence is almost unthinkable and terribly frightening. It is this fear that acts as fuel for cynicism and skepticism. Nevertheless, even the shrewdest of universal critics would have their work cut out for them if they were given the task of proving that the 3rd KLIMUN was not, indeed, life-changing for all parties concerned. Prior to my departure for the conference, I scoffed at a prediction made on its official website that the atmosphere would be filled with “surpassed expectations.” I now retract my denouncement in embarrassment and with humility.
KLIMUN, strangely enough, expanded my mind exponentially by making me first realize just how little of it was filled. As I took my seat in the Political and Human Rights committees’ chamber, I inwardly beamed to myself, thinking the following “What issue could possibly be brought up that I haven’t at least heard mentioned before?” Not too long thereafter, I noticed that the interior of my mouth was experiencing a severe drought and that the nerve endings in my limbs were all but shorted out. At that point in time, my brain was struggling to cope with a perpetual kamikaze attack of new information: speeches about the situation in Gaza, the use of antiretroviral drugs and self determination were being heard but not processed. I would not be lying if I told you that I felt mentally retarded, like a preschooler sitting in on a university lecture. This was not just because I was made aware of how ignorant and ill-informed I was. It was also because I found myself in the presence of individuals far better at debate and critical thinking than me. I didn’t walk out of the theatre: I limped out, like a wounded dog with a battered ego. I croaked to Wei Jie, “Man, I am so out of my depth, it’s just not funny.” I am grateful to KLIMUN for diminishing the size of my previously swelled head by making me realize that I have a long way to go indeed before I can claim with any degree of honesty that I know about the world and the situations its children are facing. These last 5 days have made me want to explore and acquire knowledge with renewed vigor. I may want to make a change, an impact but if I don’t know about the issues I have to address to be able to do so, I might as well commit myself to the anti-progressive cause that is selfish stagnancy.
KLIMUN taught me about the invaluable nature of belief and the importance of pursuing a goal regardless of how many potholes and rocks may be found on the path that leads to its achievement. During the closing ceremony, members of the Secretariat spoke of how, at one point, KLIMUN was on the verge of being discarded as a good idea that lacked the support of a sufficient number of delegates. If they hadn’t decided to doggedly go ahead with preparations hoping for the best, 80 individuals would’ve missed out on the opportunity to have epiphany after epiphany after epiphany, through questioning, consideration and the declaration of opinions. I salute Emmanuel, Matthew and all their co-conspirators for their impeccable organization, doting supervision and flawlessly professional adjudication. The world could really do with more folks like them.
 At the end of the opening ceremony, I’d felt somewhat disappointed at the absence of a large number of delegates from overseas. Needless to say, this dissatisfaction rapidly ebbed away as I came to terms with the delegates who were able to make it. When I think of Reza from Iran, Seth from Botswana, Divine from Nigeria and Hemish from Kenya (all of whom are studying locally), I laugh at my own foolish thought that day that KLIMUN was not going to be the international experience I’d hoped for. What’s more, the colorful Malaysian characters that were such a massive part of my life for 5 days in diplomatic paradise made the question of nationality hastily exit my mind with its tail between its legs. Shaza, Juliana, Dhania, Diana, Frank, Jeremy, Daniel, Vivian, Aravind, Audrey, Anna, Shehan, Manveen, Nanthini, Sheela, Mark, Irfaan, Soong Kit and, of course, Lewis, Michelle, Azam, Khairil, Eileen, Cassie, Keat Meng, Nicholas and Wei Jie : thanks for existing. I love you all, and I cannot tell you how grateful I am that our paths have crossed.
“Live life to the point of tears,” advised Albert Camus. And I can vouch for the fact that, between August the 16th and August the 21st, his recommendation was followed to the letter by over a 100 young men and women in a distant corner of Nilai, who came together to fight a good, no, a great fight in the name of humanity itself. Pesky cynics may squeal miserably that all of us have returned to the routines of our respective lives and that this illuminating experience will soon by eclipsed by the clouds of memory loss and preoccupation with mundane, worldly priorities. Let me silence you with this promise: we refuse to wash our hands of KLIMUN unconsciously. Somewhere, deep within all of our chest cavities, a flame of inspiration has sparked into being. Somewhere in all of our minds, a realization - that, while we thrive, countless others suffer without even a semblance of assistance and subsequently evaporate – has risen and spread like a wildfire to our fingertips and toes. KLIMUN is just the beginning to our lives as agents of change and advocates of awareness. World, watch this space.
Continue Reading...

REVIEW: THE FINAL DESTINATION OR LOOKING AT A SYMBOL OF TRUE CINEMATIC DECOMPOSITION

   Ah, it’s that time of year again – when shadows stalk than follow, when superstitions again float to the surface of human consciousness, when specters, omens and apparitions seem to be peeking with macabre mischievousness around every street corner, anticipating and savoring Mr. Everyman’s naïve, unassuming approach. In spite of these statements, this written piece is actually not going to explore the realm of the supernatural in light of Halloween looming on the world’s event horizon. I’m not interested in separating fact from fiction, narrating eerie occurrences or considering the idea of there being ‘greater forces at play.’ No, what I want to do is highlight the massive opportunity that ‘All Hallows’ Eve’ presents to filmmakers – be they in the States, Korea, Japan, Thailand or elsewhere – to take advantage of the menace that seems to hang in the air, cloud our minds and stifle our powers of reasoning and rationality. Is it by coincidence that movies slated for release this October include Zombieland, Antichrist, Horrorween, Saw VI, After.Life and Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant? Indeed, one could say that cinemagoers, for this month and the next, will most likely be in the mood for terror, and that their desire for skin-crawling suspense can be satisfied by movie-makers with relative ease. It is with this taken into consideration that I find myself having no choice but to pronounce The Final Destination a wretched, pathetically mumbled excuse for a horror movie, an undisguised insult to both scare supremos - Alfred Hitchcock, John Carpenter, Wes Craven and Co. - and advocates of human intellectual evolution alike.
    Harsh, you find me? Cruel, you deem me? Well, if that’s the way the cookie crumbles, let’s analyze the sequence of picture frames (I refuse to use the word ‘film’) in question, to fully understand the point of view I’ve put forward.  If actors are supposed to make or break a film, it’s safe to say that TFD has been comprehensively shattered by the performances of its cast members.  Pretty faces and enviable figures frequently flit across the screen, but fail quite magnificently to make viewers care about the fates of the characters being portrayed. When audience members chortle at the sight of intestines being sucked through and expelled from a high pressure pool draining pump, one realizes that a film has gone horribly, horribly wrong. Melodrama aside, I will honestly tell you that TFD’s gore-filled universe is populated by more stereotypical characters than any self-respecting human being would care to imagine.
     I’ve just realized that I haven’t provided you with a terse, cogent summary of this incredibly complex cinematic production. Please excuse my lack of foresight and allow me to do so. Here goes: people die. OK, fine, I’ll try to be less sadistically vague: people die AFTER escaping death once. There really is nothing more I can say, simply because any other aspects of the film are but blatant attempts to hide the gaping black hole that exists where TFD’s plot should. Needless to say, the baptism of set after set in industrially copious quantities of bright red corn syrup and latex organs is incapable of adding any semblance of purpose or direction to a movie that seems to have been made for lack of better things to do. Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of TFD is the fact that its director and screenwriters have made no attempt to even try and be original. In short, this film is excruciatingly, almost surreally formulaic – and I sincerely doubt that the formula employed will be winning the Nobel Prize for Physics any time soon.  
        I was tempted to detail the exuberantly crass nature of TFD’s heavy metal soundtrack, but I abstained from doing so because a realization dawned upon me as I closed my eyes and reflected upon Hollywood’s recent offerings in the ‘Thrills and Chills’ department. I thought to myself “The Final Destination isn’t an unprecedentedly bad film: it’s a cry for help!” Sadly, it seems apparent that life is draining out of the American horror film industry, a body starved of inspiration and fresh ideas, a group that has desperately turned to grotesquely creative makeup artists, medieval instruments of torture, exhaustively used premises - and the ‘art’ of remaking. It is ironically depressing the answer to an inquiry about which recent American horror films have experienced critical success is the question ‘What do The Ring, The Grudge, Dark Water and Shutter have in common?’ Was it really that long ago that Damien and Reagan scared the world senseless?  Will the likes of Norman Bates, Michael Myers and Jack Torrance never have true contemporary counterparts? Is it too much to ask for unsettling subtlety, unforgettably nerve-racking theme songs and conceptual, intellectually constructed terror to re-enter the scopes of American filmmakers? Is the answer to my last question ‘Yes?’ Now that really does give me the willies. 




by Pratik Raghu (June 09)
Continue Reading...

Seeing the world through the eyes of another person

Seeing the world through the eyes of another person

5 DAYS
By Pratik Raghu, seeing the world via his grandmother, Rathna Narasimhiah

Monday July 20th
The creaking and clicking of my husband’s cane woke me. I turned my head in his direction but did not rise to help him make his way to the bathroom, as I used to so many times a night before. I felt nervous until he was again back under his covers, but I reminded myself that Sheelu was right: he needs to learn how to take care of himself. The signs are encouraging: he no longer mumbles “Rathna!” every time an object is just out of reach and he, thankfully, has stopped washing his hands above his plate at the table. He seems to have rediscovered laughter in Asterix’s world and the dimmest of twinkles has crept back into his milky eyes.  It is wonderful to see him walk around the house from time to time, especially when I think about the state he was in before Babu and Sheelu came over: barely alive, hardly audible, almost immovable; not even a shadow of the indomitable man I’d married. Coming here was an excellent move and we really should have the Gods bless Sheela, Raghu and Pratik for everything they’ve done, everything they’ve sacrificed. (Should I give them something? Would they let me?) True, I miss Besant Nagar, my students, my classes, our neighbors, the salty sea air, our home, our street… I even found myself wondering if the crows had noticed our absence! Then again, the remarkable change in Narasimhiah has justified our year away from everything we’ve known. Let’s hope he stays this way. Another fall would undo everything. What would I do? What would I be able to do…?

Tuesday July 21st 
Cooked baingan bartha today. I must say that it came out very well indeed: Sheelu made my day when she remarked, after just one mouthful, “Eh, fundoo stuff, Mummy!” Even so, I wonder how much better my dish would’ve tasted if I’d been able to get my hands on some real Indian brinjals, not the tasteless, oversized, artificially enhanced objects on display at the pasar malam. Speaking of the night market, I’m proud to say that neither my daughter nor my son can accuse me of having a closed mind: every Thursday, I tag along with Sheelu to buy vegetables and fruits. Every Thursday, I’m exposed to the sights of carved cow carcasses hung on hooks and to the unmistakable stench of fish, prawns, eels and whatnot steaming on blocks of ice. In the past, just overhearing mamsaharis discuss their plans for dinner would be enough to make me shudder with disgust: now, take a look at me! I suppose I now know that I have to accept their lifestyle – even though I still look at their platters and think of how the chickens, pigs, goats and lambs they devour with gusto must’ve lived their lives before... you know what I mean.
Sometimes, I sit and wonder whether Sheelu and Babu have ever looked at an egg carton and imagined, in its place, a dozen fluffy, chirpy golden yellow chicks looking back at them, with beady, unassuming little eyes. My children have gotten furious with me on so many occasions over this matter. “Oh, stop being ridiculous, Mummy!”“Mummy, you are just too much. How can you be so fussy?” I am not fussy. What I am is considerate – I never forget that humans aren’t the only beings with thoughts, feelings, the ability to experience pain – and the right to live and die natural deaths. So, will I never know the artery clogging goodness of ‘butter chicken’ dissolving on my tongue? Will I never be able to appreciate the flaky texture of fish flesh smoked over the open flame? Fruits and vegetables will be just fine, thank you very much. 

Wednesday July 22nd
Watched Pratik getting ready for school in the morning, ironing his clothes, wolfing down his dosai, strapping on his expensive shoes (I believe they’re called ‘sneakers’ – don’t ask me why) and disappearing around the corner with a broad smile and the promise “Behgah wahpuhs berthini, Ajii.” I still can’t believe that he’s 16 years old, 6 feet tall and two years away from university. Was it really so long ago that he could barely reach the doorbell on tiptoe? That he used to run back from Sunny Brook’s, coming home to a bear hug, a plate of  saar anna with  Ruffle’s Lays chips and an afternoon of Tom, Jerry, the Speed Racer and Captain Planet? He’s still a baby to me and a “Putani” to Narasimhiah, whose face lights up every time he realizes his grandson is even in his vicinity. Pratik came along at just the right time for Narasimhiah – towards the tail end of his working life – and so he was able to shower him with all the attention in the world. One should really stand back and marvel at the lengths Narasimhiah has gone to give Pratik all the things, but more importantly, all the time his parents never could provide him – he was one of 14 to be tended to, after all.
Sometimes I wonder if we try to ‘smother’ our children and grandchildren with love. I know, it seems like a silly thought – but why then has Sheelu gotten angry with me for repeating instructions or pieces of advice to her, Raghu or Pratik? Doesn’t she know that all we want is to make their lives a little easier, a little more convenient by encouraging them not to make mistakes that anyone could – and that we might’ve made before? I get annoyed when we try to help, but are seen as being – what did Sheelu say? – “overprotective and overbearing.” Is it so wrong for us to show our concern and our affection for them by pointing certain things out? They shouldn’t assume that, just because we belong to an older generation, we are completely unaware of situations that they may face.

Thursday July 23rd
Sheela was so unreasonable today – we had an argument that could’ve so easily been avoided if she had been thinking clearly. The truth is that I have had to stay at home for most of the time we’ve spent in Malaysia – and I wouldn’t have it any other way: I know that I need to be at Narasimhiah’s side to help him with certain tasks every now and then, and be on my watch, just in case… no, I won’t, I won’t consider it. The thing is, unlike in Besant Nagar, I have very few things to busy myself with. I have no students coming in, eager to learn glass painting, doll making, Tanjore art, tie and dye, knitting and pencil sketching. I am not able to look forward to the visit of even the fruit vendor, the milkman, the postman, anyone for that matter. The nearest beach is two hours away, so a brisk shoreline walk in the early hours of the morning is out of the question.  Watching soap operas and reading Tamil novels becomes tedious after a while. All I have to really engage myself with is cooking and household chores. This may seem a sad state of affairs, but I’m grateful to have something, anything to take my mind off the monotony that has become my life. In any case, I see these tasks as small ways of repaying Sheela and her family, to express So, I set about cleaning the living room today, determined to put an end to the messiness that had consumed it. My feet hurt and my back ached slightly, but I was driven by the image of Sheela coming home to a ‘glittering’ welcome. I had just finished going over it one last time with a vacuum cleaner, when I heard a key turn in the lock. I straightened up and quickly surveyed my handiwork with pride. Sheela came in, and I smiled at here, asking “Notice anything, Sheelu?” She glanced at the gleaming tiles on the ground, the neatly arranged items on the coffee table and the carpet that had not so long ago been unrecognizable under a layer of dust and grime. I waited eagerly for her reaction. Then, in the most furious of tones, eyes wide open, my daughter whispered “Do you think… you’re our servant, Mummy?”
I can still hear the angry echoes of Sheela’s words: “What were you thinking? Don’t you care about your health? Who asked you to clean up the living room?” I’m hurt and – I just don’t understand. All I wanted to do was help: is that so difficult to see, to understand? What have I done wrong to receive this kind of treatment? “Servants” aren’t the only people who should have to clean up a house! Sometimes, Sheelu really does shock me with her behavior.

Friday July 24th
This probably sounds silly but – I just can’t help but feel that Pratik is up to something. For the last week or so, he’s been peppering me with questions about what I’ve been doing and how I pass the time every day. If I didn’t know any better, I would think he’s trying to put himself in my shoes and see the world through my eyes! I know, it seems a ridiculous thing to do, but you never know with children nowadays…
We are getting closer and closer to Babu’s arrival: I cannot wait to see my children and my grandchildren come together under one roof. I wonder how Aditya and Yamini have changed since I last saw them. I think about how long their hair will be, how tall they would’ve become, what they’ll now be obsessed with, what they’ll have to tell me.  It’s one thing to be able to hear their voices over the phone every now and then, but another thing entirely to be able to sit them on your lap and tell them stories, or cook breakfast for them as they sit sleepily at the table. The chances we have to really be a ‘whole family’ again are few and far between, so we must make the most of them.
Continue Reading...
 

The Opinionated Ones Copyright © 2009 WoodMag is Designed by Ipietoon for Free Blogger Template